Dark Light

Convicted Steubenville Rapist to Appeal Because Brain Wasn’t “Fully Developed”

A lawyer for one of the two Steubenville teens convicted of raping a 16-year-old told Piers Morgan that they planned on appealing the guilty verdict because his client’s brain wasn’t “fully developed” enough at the time of the crime. According to the lawyer’s logic, the average 16-year-old’s brain (the age of the convicted rapist), is not “developed” enough to know that rape is wrong. As The Atlantic Wire points out, this is the same defense attorney that claimed the victim’s unconscious state (and subsequent silence at the time of the crime) amounted to consent. You can watch the interview here

© 2022 RELEVANT Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top

You’re reading our ad-supported experience

For our premium ad-free experience, including exclusive podcasts, issues and more, subscribe to

Plans start as low as $2.50/mo