
For years, the prevailing narrative has been that Millennials and Gen Z are solidly pro-choice, unwavering in their support for abortion access. But a new nationwide poll suggests something far more nuanced. Their views on abortion reveal a shift that defies traditional assumptions.
The survey, which polled 18-42 year-old adults, paints a complex picture: Nearly 7 in 10 young voters support some limits on abortion, a slight increase from last year (up 67% from 65%). Even more surprising, a majority of Millennials and Gen Z respondents—60%—believe that human rights begin in the womb. These statistics indicate a broader reevaluation of abortion and its surrounding policies among younger voters.
Planned Parenthood, a longtime leader in pro-choice advocacy, also finds itself on shaky ground with Millennials and Gen Z. After being presented with information about the organization’s business practices, including allegations of unsafe conditions and misuse of taxpayer dollars, 30% of respondents with favorable views of Planned Parenthood reported viewing the organization less favorably. Less than half of respondents (48%) support federal funding for Planned Parenthood, a sharp decline for an organization that receives more than $500 million in taxpayer funding annually. Many young voters expressed a preference for redirecting those funds to mental health care, general healthcare or public schools—services they believe would have a more meaningful impact on communities.
Concerns about chemical abortion pills have further complicated the conversation. The poll found that more than 9 in 10 respondents support measures to regulate the use of these pills, including mandatory ultrasounds, blood testing to protect fertility and studies on the environmental impact of medical waste. Younger voters are not just thinking about the immediate effects on women; they’re also worried about the broader implications for public health and the environment. This multifaceted concern reflects a generation that values both individual and collective well-being.
When it comes to abortion limits, the issue of fetal pain was a major factor for many respondents. Sixty-three percent of young voters supported restrictions on abortion after 12.5 weeks if the fetus could feel pain, and 66% supported limits after 24 weeks. This suggests that for many Millennials and Gen Z voters, the conversation around abortion isn’t solely about gestational age but also about the experiences of the unborn child and the ethical implications of pain.
Compassionate policy solutions also resonate strongly with younger voters. Nearly a third (31%) said they would be more willing to accept limits on abortion if additional support services were in place, such as paid family leave and affordable childcare. This underscores a desire for a more holistic approach to policy—one that balances restrictions with meaningful resources for families.
Even on polarizing issues like abortion survivors, there’s widespread agreement. Almost 9 in 10 respondents believe that babies born alive during botched abortions deserve medical care, and 66% think 911 should be called in such cases. These findings point to common ground that could shape future conversations and solutions.
The poll offers a roadmap: Focus on compassion, protection and practical solutions. Younger voters want policies that prioritize human dignity while addressing the needs of families and the environment. They’re less swayed by sweeping rhetoric and more inclined to support nuanced, thoughtful approaches.